Manager Research

We provide detailed institutional-quality global investment manager research and fund ratings. Based in South Africa and the UK,
all members of our manager research team have over ten years of investment experience.

Coronation make significant changes to their core fund range

11 Aug 2015

Coronation announced widespread changes to the fee structures on many of their funds, as well as changes to the benchmarks and mandates on certain funds. The changes are generally positive (but not in all cases) for their clients and a relatively material shift that we suspect may have many South African asset managers revisiting their fee structures. The changes will in most cases result in lower fees through the cycle on the funds and end up with fee structures that are simple and easier to understand. The fees are effective from 1 October 2015 but Coronation will apply the lower of the existing and new fee structures for the first 12 months.

Coronation have sent out a lot of detail on the changes and in the latest Corospondent, Pieter Koekemoer wrote a good summary of the changes.

In this note we look at the changes to the six local funds affected and provide our opinion on the impact on clients. We will look at the changes to the offshore funds separately. All the fees quoted below exclude VAT. Before we turn our attention to the funds, we look at the change in the South African and Global equity benchmarks, which will be applied consistently across all funds where local and global shares are a component of the investable universe.

CHANGE TO LOCAL EQUITY BENCHMARK:
The benchmark has changed from SWIX (FTSE/JSE Shareholder Weighted Index) for the Equity and multi-asset funds and from the Top 40 (FTSE/JSE Top 40 Index) for the Top 20 Fund to CAPI (FTSE/JSE Capped All Share Index).


There is no perfect index available for benchmark purposes but the CAPI is probably the best available index for retail equity funds. The CAPI includes all shares listed on the FTSE/JSE All Share Index (ALSI) but caps each share's weighting at a maximum of 10%. The SWIX was originally introduced to adjust (albeit crudely) for the dominance of the heavyweight miners in the index – given their relative underperformance, the unintended consequence is that the SWIX has ended up being a poor representation of the investable universe. The issues relating to SWIX have been covered by many commentators, including Coronation’s Neville Chester earlier this year.

So we agree with the change to CAPI, but the timing of the change is worth consideration - SWIX has been a difficult index to outperform in the recent past, and it has outperformed both CAPI and ALSI. The timing of the change (at a point following strong SWIX performance) means that the historical performance of the fund will look better relative to the new benchmark. For fund fact sheets and other client communications, Coronation will splice benchmark returns (i.e. use the old benchmark for performance until 30 September 2015 and the new benchmark indices from 1 October 2015). The impact of the timing of the change is mitigated to an extent by the 1 year period of the lower of the two fee structures.


CHANGE TO GLOBAL EQUITY BENCHMARK:
The international equity benchmark is changing from the MSCI World Index to MSCI All Country World Index (ACWI).

The MSCI World Index by definition has very low Emerging Market exposure (close to zero) while the MSCI ACWI has approximately 13% exposure to emerging markets at the moment. This does make sense given the investable universe and for Coronation, their long track record and expertise in emerging markets means the change in benchmark would fit well with their capabilities.

1. Coronation Equity

Mandate and Benchmark changes:
Coronation Equity has always been a domestic only equity fund, but in line with many of its competitors it will now allow up to 25% in offshore listed equities and a further 5% in African equities. In line with this, the benchmark changes from SWIX to 87.5% CAPI, 12.5% MSCI ACWI (MSCI All Country World Index). The 12.5% reflects the midpoint between 0% and the maximum 25% offshore equity allowance.

Fee changes:
- The base fee remains unchanged at 1.1% for direct (and 0.7% clean through platforms).
- The performance fee sharing rate will increase from 15% to 20%.
- The performance fee cap reduces from 1.9% to 1.5%.
- A new feature of the performance fee structure is that the fee is discounted to 0.75% (0.35% for clean) if returns are below the benchmark over a rolling 5 years.


We view the fee changes on Coronation Equity as mixed. The increase in the performance sharing rate will result in higher fees being paid through the cycle in our opinion. It is difficult to quantify the impact of this change on fees going forward because of the inclusion of the offshore allowance and the benchmark components changing (e.g. SWIX to CAPI). Market dynamics will determine which of the benchmarks will be harder to beat going forward, but in essence it is an increase in the sharing of upside.

The only question on the blended benchmark is around the offshore weighting of 12.5%. If the portfolio managers envisage that they will on average have 12.5% of the fund in offshore equity through the cycle then the weighting makes sense. It means that when they have more or less than the 12.5%, the portfolio managers are making an active call. However if the portfolio managers are going to average closer to the maximum of 25% through the cycle, it means that the fund is structurally overweight relative to its benchmark and that the relative performance will be driven by the relative performance of local and offshore markets rather than a specific view of the portfolio managers.

The positive change is the introduction of improved symmetry with clients paying a lower fee to compensate in part for longer term underperformance. Using 5 years rolling (as opposed to 2 years on the upside) means that the strong past performance of the fund will be in the numbers for a while, but long term the change makes sense.

The lower fee cap is the other positive, but needs to be put in context – to breach the 1.5% performance fee cap on the 20% sharing rate, the fund would need to outperform the benchmark by 7.5% after fees on a rolling two year basis which is very unlikely especially given the size of the assets managed by Coronation. So it is positive but unlikely to have an impact.


2. Top 20

Mandate and Benchmark changes:
Coronation Top 20 will remain a domestic only equity fund. The fund has always invested in a maximum of 20 shares representing their top calls in the largest 50 shares by market capitalisation. A proposal has been made to remove the limitation to the top 50 (but this change is subject to investor ballot). The benchmark will change from ALSI to CAPI.

Fee changes:
- Apart from the change in benchmark, there is only one change to the fee structure. The fee has always been discounted down to 0.50% (or 0.1% for clean class) if the fund underperformed over a 2 year rolling period. This has now been changed to 5 years rolling.


We view the proposed change to include shares outside the largest 50 shares as a positive (i.e. a wider universe of shares). We also believe the change from ALSI to CAPI makes sense. The change to a longer rolling period for the discount is more difficult: it makes sense in theory given the appropriate investment timeframe for investors in the fund, but the significant outperformance that would fall out of the performance fee if it stayed at 2 years rolling will now remain in the 5 year rolling figures. This is mitigated to an extent by the clients paying the lower of the old and new structure for the next year, but if the fund underperforms in the coming year or two, the change will in all likelihood result in clients paying a higher fee than they would have if the 2 year rolling remained.


3. Coronation Balanced Plus

Mandate and Benchmark changes:
The Coronation Balanced Plus fund uses a composite benchmark: 52.5% equity, 22.5% bonds, 5% Benchmark cash, 20% international. The benchmark remains as is except the equity building block changes from SWIX to CAPI.

Fee changes:
None


The change to use CAPI rather than SWIX for the benchmark equity weight makes sense. The current fee of 1.25% retail (and 0.85% clean) is a reasonable flat fee for the fund.


4. Coronation Market Plus

Mandate and Benchmark changes:
The Coronation Market Plus fund uses a composite benchmark: 52.5% equity, 22.5% bonds, 5% Benchmark cash, 20% international (made up of 14.5% equity, 3.5% bonds, 2% cash). The benchmark remains as is except the local and global equity building blocks change as described earlier from SWIX to CAPI.

Fee changes:
- The base fee remains unchanged at 1.25% for direct (and 0.85% clean through platforms).
- The performance fee changes in two ways: the performance fee cap reduces from 1.75% to 1.15%; and the net-of-fees fund performance is now compared to benchmark on a rolling 2 year basis (as opposed to a rolling 1 year in the past).
- The old fee structure discounted the fee to 0.75% for retail (0.35% for clean) when the fund return is negative over a rolling 5 year period. This is changed so that the fee is reduced to 0.75% for retail (0.35% for clean) when the fund return is below the benchmark over a rolling 5 year period.


It is interesting that for the other asset allocation funds, the performance fee has been removed but for market plus, the performance fee is retained. It makes sense to some extent given the higher return target and more flexible mandate. The lower fee cap is a positive for clients and the change to a 2 year rolling performance comparison makes sense. The impact of the longer rolling period on fees in the short term is mitigated by clients paying the lower of the two fee structures for the first year.

It is positive for clients that the change to the rolling 5 year discount means that fund performance is being compared to benchmark (as opposed to the return needing to be negative before the discount applies).



5. Coronation Capital Plus

Mandate and Benchmark changes:
None

Fee changes:
- The base fee is increased from 1.25% to 1.4% for direct (and from 0.85% to 1% for the clean class).
- The performance fee is removed.
- The reduction in fee to 0.75% for direct (0.35% for clean class) remains but in the past this reduction kicked in if performance was negative over 12 months. This has now been changed to 24 months.


Apart from the fee being far simpler to explain, clients benefit from the removal of the performance fee. We do think that a flat fee makes more sense for a fund of this nature.

However, the clients will pay a higher base fee - the extra 0.15% base fee is equivalent to 1.5% outperformance of the benchmark (CPI+4%) after fees under the old fee structure (i.e. performance fee was 10% of the outperformance on an after fees basis). The historic outperformance of benchmark has been 3.9% since inception and 2.4% over the last 10 years. The timing of the change in fee isn’t ideal given the poor relative performance over 1 year (the measurement period for the old performance fee calculation) – the negative perception of the timing is mitigated to an extent by the 1 year period where clients pay the lower of the old and new fee structures.

We have had very strong equity markets over the last 15 years and consensus opinion is that we are entering a lower return environment. Achieving CPI+5.5% after fees on a fund like Capital Plus will be more difficult going forward.

The change from 12 to 24 months for determining whether a fee reduction is applied should mean that the reduction is applied less frequently but we do think 24 months is more appropriate.



6. Coronation Balanced Defensive

Mandate and Benchmark changes:
None

Fee changes:
- The base fee is decreased from 1.5% to 1.4% for direct (and from 1.1% to 1% for the clean class).
- The fund used to charge no fee if the fund had negative performance over any 2 year period. This has been removed, but the reduction in fee to 0.75% for direct (0.35% for clean class) remains if performance is negative over 12 months.


The fee changes are positive for clients – the lower base fee is obviously a positive, and we don’t believe the removal of the reduction in fee to zero for negative 2 year performance is very significant for a conservative fund like Balanced Defensive, as one would expect 2 year rolling performance to be negative only very infrequently.




Download this commentary.